- From: Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:04:47 -0800
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: www-webont-wg@w3.org
"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote: > Comments on Overview and Guide > > (I'm waiting for the new version of Reference before providing comments.) > > - title - I changed to > OWL Web Ontology Language > Semantics and Abstract Syntax > on the suggestion of Jim Hendler. This makes it clear that OWL > is not a misspelling of an acronym. I suggest that we again > revisit the idea of a common way of naming the documents. is this the new consensus on titles? i do not have a strong opinion other than the documents should be consistent. the overview is currently following the last agreement that i thought we had on naming conventions. the current title is: Web Ontology Language (OWL): Overview if this is the new consensus, then I am happy to name the document OWL Web Ontology Language Overview and a followup question is are we having any version information on the top of the documents? thanks, deborah
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2003 21:04:56 UTC