- From: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 18:20:39 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
MINUTES from Teleconference Web Ontology Working Group July 24, 2003, 1200 (East US), 0900 (West US). 1700 (London) ===== Executive Summary: DECISIONS: RESOLVED: Have the CR request say that the syntactic restriction on structure reuse is at risk. See 3.2 below for details. RESOLVED: Request advancement of all OWL Working Drafts to Candidate Recommendation (CR) status. See 4.0 below for exact proposal text and details of the vote. ACTIONS: Sandro to see that changes are completed in Overview addressing QA issues (specifically: complete document roadmap). NEW ACTIONS: ACTION Ian to draft a response for Dave Reynolds on the issue of named dataranges, discussing the danger of uncomfortable interactions between datatypes and such dataranges. ACTION Jeremy to produce 4 or 5 new test cases for structure sharing checking (issue discussed in 3.2 below). ACTION Peter Patel-Schneider to look over Jeremy's B1 B2 proof revision. ACTION Jim Hendler to change CR request to indicate risk for syntax constraint on structure sharing (see 3.2 below). ACTION Jim Hendler to reply to Dave Reynolds saying we have added the above to the "at risk list." ACTION WD editors to prepare drafts for CR Overview: Sandro Guide: Mike S. Reference: Mike D. S&AS: Peter Test: Jeremy/Jos Requirements: Sandro/Jeff (see Document change review in 4.0 below for problems noted with editor drafts). DONE! ACTION Jeremy Carroll to review Wine and Food ontologies from Guide ACTION? Jeremy Carroll to review recent language layering changes to S and AS. ===== More detail: IRC: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/webont/2003-07-24#T15-54-05 AGENDA: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jul/0262.html Chair: Sandro Hawke (in place of Jim Hendler) Scribe: Evan Wallace 1. Administrivia (10 min; chair/scribe) Regrets: Frank van Harmelen, Deborah McGuinness, Dan Connolly, Guus Schreiber, Jerome Euzenat, Jim Hendler, Marwan Sabbouh, Pat Hayes, Jonathon Borden, Jeff Heflin Role Call Bijan Parsia (UMd), Mike Smith, Sandro Hawke, Evan Wallace, Peter Patel-Schneider, Herman ter Horst, Jeremy Carroll, Ian Horrocks, Mike Dean. Jim Hendler (briefly), Chris Welty, Charles White, Jos De Roo, Pat Hayes Approve Minutes of Jul 10: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jul/0097.html APPROVED by concensus Provisional telecon schedule for summer: Jul 31 NO telecon Aug 7 telecon, chair Schreiber, scribe TBD Aug 14 NO telecon Aug 21 telecon, chair Hendler, scribe TBD Agenda Ammendments none 2. ACTION ITEM REVIEW (10 min; Chair) Last Call Comment Actions: NONE! Document Actions: ACTION Sandro to see that changes to Overview are made to respond to QA comments (complete document roadmap, etc.) CONTINUED Actions continued: Done ACTION jjc make sure test has owl:sameAs in Lite and no owl:sameIndividualAs Done ACTION jjc Add owl:Thing = owl:Nothing test Done ACTION JJC update test document to reflect iff => if DONE: ACTION MikeS to add new compoundkey issue DONE ACTION MikeSmith change closing text to reflect iff => if DONE ACTION PFPS editorial change to reflect iff => if 3.0 Issues in need of discussion (<30 min total) 3.1 Datatyping question from Dave Reynolds (5 min; Jeremy Carroll) In the message http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jul/0050.html Dave Reynolds explains that I misunderstood what he was asking for in my reply to him - he makes a good case, which Jeremy expands on in his message http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jul/0252.html The WG should decide whether to add this feature or not. If the latter, someone should take an action to send a message summarizing the WG's response to him. JJC: Can we name these? If not why not? PPS: I believe that this does overlap with the XML Schema datatype issue. JJC: This is for named dataranges. PPS: It is a proposal to get around datatype issue using oneOf. JJC: The lack of a name is to positively discourage use (to Ian)? Ian: The use of a name brings up issues of determining if these are identifying datatypes. JJC: The concern is then that this leads to a danger of uncomfortable interactions between datatypes and dataranges. New ACTION: Ian to draft a response for Dave Reynolds discussing this interaction issue. 3.2 bnode issues - B1 and B2 revisited (25 min; Jeremy Carroll) The WG needs to resolve this once and for all. A straw poll will be taken as to whether to a - reopen issue 5.26, accept Jeremy's solution to B1,B2, and close. b - Retain the status quo, keeping the issue closed over Jeremy's objection. JJC: This was a part of a discussion on improving the syntax of OWL.... I beleive that I have shown that this can work with the correspondance proof, which was the problem with it going into LastCall. PPS: I was initially unconvinced, but have not had a chance to review his latest version produced ~ a month ago. I haven't had the cycles, but it is on my desk. Jos spoke in favor of the proposal. Mike S: This is essentially about allowing structure sharing? others: yes. Should be no change in semantics. JJC: The reason for making the change is for convenience (in implementation). PPS: I don't see any reason why the proof shouldn't work, but it is changing a significant assumption in the SandAS, so it is important to review it carefully. Stawpoll on option A: Reopen issue, Accept Jeremy's change to close. no, abstain, yes, no, no, no, no, abstain, yes, no, yes, abstain [may have not captured all the "no"s -Ed] Option B: Have the CR request say that this restriction is at risk of changing. Implementation discussion: Bijan reports not much structure sharing checking yet in UMd impl's. JJC reports that his impl does many, but not all, of these checks. Straw: yes, abstain, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes official vote: RESOLVED with no objections, Sandro abstaining Actions: JJC: generate 4 or 5 test cases PPS: look over Jeremy's B1 B2 proof revision JimH: change CR request to indicate risk JimH: reply to Dave Reynolds saying we have added this to the "at risk list." >It should be noted that in the past the WG did express a willingness >to do A if Jeremy could fix the correspondence proof, which he has >now done. >(A would remove Jeremy's objection to 5.26, but would require >actioning editorial change to the S&AS document. B would require a >reworking of the CR request w/respect to the status of this issue). [Jeremy was satisfied with this resolution and subsequently withdrew HP's objection, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jul/0301.html.] 4.0 Proposal to Request Candidate Recommendation Status (30 min; Sandro) Proposal and rationale: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jul/0210.html Draft CE Director's request: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/rqim.html Document change review: Overview: no editor present to discuss -Sandro to see that roadmap is made complete Guide: see appendix D in editors draft (Changelog since last call release) - JJC to review Wine and Food ontologies. This has already begun, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jul/0306.html - rdf link needs updating Reference: (appendix F is change log) - still need to make change regarding the absence of daml:item - dc:date out of date - Jos will look over owl.owl (not in critical path) S and AS (appendix C is the change log) - JJC wants to look at recent changes relating to layering (iff->if) Test (appendix G is change log. Jeremy notes that the document asserts that changes will continue until PR status) - Jos found the number of tests not yet recommended too great, but we could not fix this on the telecon. - XML literal with language tags still needs to be done. Requirements: editor not in attendance - old, misleading date on editor's draft noted. Discussion: Dependencies on RDF Core. Need a consistent story on this. Editors will have to change links as RDF documents change. A revised proposal was sent by Sandro (with agreement from Jim Hendler): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jul/0291.html Proposed: To submit a request to the Director of the W3C that the six Last Call Documents, as amended in accordance with group decisions made at this and prior Working Group meetings, be advanced to Candidate Recommendation status, with a minimal CR duration of between four and six weeks, ending in mid-September. Straw: yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes Formal voting record: Member Organization Representative yes/no/abstain ------------------- -------------- -------------- Agfa-Gevaert Jos De Roo yes Daimler Chrysler DFKI DISA EDS Mike Smith yes Electricite de France Fujitsu FZI Hewlett Packard Jeremy Carroll yes IBM Chris Welty yes Ibrow * Guss Schreiber yes INRIA INTAP - Japan IVIS Group Lucent Peter Patel-Schneider yes MIT/W3C (team) Sandro Hawke yes Mitre ******* Marwan Sabbouh yes Mondeca ****** Bernard Vatant yes Motorola Network Inference Ian Horrocks yes NIST Evan Wallace yes Nokia *** Ora Lassila yes Philips Electronic NV Herman ter Horst yes Stanford Sun Microsystems Unicorn Solutions Ziv Hellman********* yes Unisys Univ of Md - MIND Bijan Parsia yes Univ of Southhampton Invited Experts ------------------ Jonathon Borden ** yes Mike Dean yes Pat Hayes yes Jeff Heflin ***** yes Masahiro Hori **** yes Lynn Stein ******** yes Results: PASSED 20 yes 0 no 0 abstain Proxies declared or referenced in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jul/index.html * - Guus proxy - Yes to CR, see msg 259 ** - Borden proxy - yes to CR, msg 247 *** - Lassila proxy - yes to CR, msg 0278 **** - Masahiro Hori proxy - yes to CR, msg 0284 ***** - Jeff Heflin proxy - yes to CR, msg 0285 ****** - Bernard Vatant proxy - yes to CR, msg 0286 ******* - Marwan Sabbouh proxy - yes to CR, msg ******** - Lynn Stein proxy - yes to CR, see msg 0297 ********* - Ziv Helman proxy - yes to CR - end voting record - >Upon passage (ed: knock wood) actions to editors and team contact to >prepare editors' drafts for publication as CR documents and to >publish these. 5.0 Raucous Celebration or Much Waling and Gnashing of Teeth (2 min, WG) (dependent on outcome of 4.0) Apparently postponed till members could reach an appropriate venue for celebration. After all, what might the web press make of such behavior? ;) 6.0 A.O.B none ADJOURN on time!
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2003 18:20:40 UTC