Re: Lang: owl:ontolgy (was RE: LANG: syntactic version for imports (and other things))

Jim, you stole my action ....

that is more or less what I was going to postively propose under:

ACTION: Carroll - send e-mail on what is in an onto.


DAML+OIL seems to assume that we can hack URIs to see that

http://example.org/onto#Potato

is defined in

http://example.org/onto

Having explicit triples that express this relationship (as Jim suggests) is
more flexible and clearer.

Jeremy

Received on Friday, 13 September 2002 07:10:19 UTC