Re: Lang: owl:ontolgy from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2002-09-13 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from September 2002)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:41:07 -0400 (EDT)
To: jjc@hpl.hp.com
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20020913.074107.91571127.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: Lang: owl:ontolgy (was RE: LANG: syntactic version for imports (and other things))
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:09:34 +0200

[...]

> DAML+OIL seems to assume that we can hack URIs to see that
> 
> http://example.org/onto#Potato
> 
> is defined in
> 
> http://example.org/onto

I would be interested in seeing how you come up with this conclusion, and
where in DAML+OIL it is used.

> Having explicit triples that express this relationship (as Jim suggests) is
> more flexible and clearer.

I'm not at all convinced on this.

> Jeremy

peter

Received on Friday, 13 September 2002 07:41:19 UTC