- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 17 Jul 2002 13:22:35 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Some notes on the meeting record; nothing critical, as it turns out... I don't think minutes are administrivia; I'd rather they carried the WOWG tag. Also... On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 11:18, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > Summary: > > ACTIONS > > ACTION jjc Make proposal for test case structure > ACTION Hendler produce test for issue 4.2 > ACTION ChrisW to propose resolution of 3.4 and 4.1 > ACTION Patel-Schneider find example illustratin computational difficulties in > having both datatypes and objects in integrated domain. > ACTION connolly point to use case for having datatypes and obejct property in > integrated domain > ACTION: hayes review abstract syntax > ACTION: connolly review abstract syntax which document is that, exactly? The record should show that, under 4.3 below. > ACTION: ter Horst review abstract syntax These are the new actions, but there are some continued actions as well. The record should be clear about that (or at least: the chair better not miss them when preparing this week's agenda!) [...] > 4.3) OWL 1.0 Abstract syntax (Horrocks, Patel-Schneider) which document was it? I don't see it from the log http://www.w3.org/2002/07/11-webont-irc Ah... there it is, from the agenda... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jul/0046.html version 10 Jul: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Jul/0031.html > > Almost skipped. > No substantive discussion. > ACTION: hayes review abstract syntax > ACTION: connolly review abstract syntax > ACTION: ter Horst review abstract syntax > > 5) A.O.B (0-5 min) > > None. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2002 14:22:34 UTC