- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:04:21 -0500
- To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Unfortunately, I don't think that this does the trick. An ontology identifier is, I think, a URI reference. At least that is what the second requirement appears to be saying. I believe that you want something very different, perhaps something along the lines of [[[ If the language supports user-displayable natural language labels for an object, then it must support multiple alternative labels for that object. This can be used, for example, to view the ontology in different natural languages. ]]] peter From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: Lexical representations Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:41:04 -0000 > > > My action from the telecon. > Suggested change: > > Old text: > > [[[ > Lexical representations > ======================= > The language must support multiple lexical representations for the same > ontology identifier. This can be used to view the ontology in different > languages. > ]]] > > > New text: > > [[[ > User displayable labels > ======================= > The language must support specifying multiple alternative user displayable > labels for the same ontology identifier. > This can be used, for example, to view the ontology in different natural > languages. > ]]] > > Is that clearer? Or does anyone have a better suggestion? > > Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2002 16:05:41 UTC