Re: REQDOC: ontologies as resources

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
> 
> PS:  What should we do with requirements that have no motivation?

We need to put a motivation for every requirement and objective. If we
can't find one, then maybe the requirement doesn't belong. I'm open to
suggestions. Currenty, these requirements are missing motivations:

1) local unique names aassumptions
2) ability to state closed worlds
3) cardinality constraints
4) layering of language features

Received on Saturday, 16 February 2002 16:10:30 UTC