Re: Requirements Document

Jim Hendler wrote:
> 
> At 2:03 PM -0500 2/14/02, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> >From: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
> >Subject: Re: Requirements Document
> >Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:23:11 -0500
> >
> 
> >  > 6) You take issue with "At a minimum, the language should recommend to
> >>  users how they can specify their own default mechanisms." If I recall
> >>  correctly, this was a resolution made by the group at a recent telecon
> >  > after considerable debate on defaults.
> >>
> >>  ACTION: The requirement will remain unchanged.
> >
> >Umm, this is an objective, not a requirement, I believe.
> 
> Peter is right - Jeff, are you proposing to make it a requirement?
> If so, it would need to be changed to a language feature - as "making
> a recommendation" applies to a document, not to a language.
> 

I meant to say objective, not requirement. Just a slip of the
keyboard...

Received on Saturday, 16 February 2002 15:44:01 UTC