- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 22:56:22 -0500
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> Subject: Re: UPDATE: longer version of layering document Date: 08 Feb 2002 16:24:08 -0600 > On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 10:27, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > Hi: > > > > Dieter and I have put together the promised longer version of the layering > > document. It is available at > > > > http://www-db.research.bell-labs.com/user/pfps/semantic-web/layering.html > > "Given that the most attractive layering solution is not possible ..." > > Hmm... at the ftf you didn't conclude that it wasn't possible; > only that it wasn't straightforward. I don't see anything > in this paper that wasn't discussed at the meeting, so > I don't see how you come to the stronger conclusion. > > Why doesn't section 5 discuss the possibilities for resolving > the paradox? An axiom of foundations, intuitionistic logic, > etc. The 4 possibilities discussed at the ftf > meeting seem to have dwindled to 3. One possibility would be to change RDF Schema in some way, perhaps by modifying the way rdfs:Class, etc., work. Do we want to include this possiblity explicitly in the document? However, I don't believe that the same-syntax extension is possible without modifying RDF Schema, and that would fit into one of the other options. peter
Received on Friday, 8 February 2002 22:57:30 UTC