Re: Review comments on OWL Semantics

Jeremy Carroll writes:

> N-triples
> =========
> I would strongly prefer that the mapping to RDF be expressed as a 
mapping 
> to the RDF abstract syntax (a graph) not to the non-preferred N-triples 
syntax.

I support this.  I made a remark to the same effect in my (partial) review 
of
the OWL semantics document at

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Nov/0043.html


Herman ter Horst