Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon

Further to my summary of the contributions to public comments list,
two new messages arrived today, both of which are also relevant to the 
semantics discussion also on the agenda for today:

Message [1] points out a bug in the DAML+OIL spec that we are about to be 
bitten by as well if we don't take care. (Essentially the current DAML+OIL 
spec of sameClassAs forces its arguments to be of type daml:Class,
even if without that statement they would only be of type rdfs:Class).

Message [2] shows the confusion people have about the relation between RDF 
and OWL: is every OWL document an RDFS document (as our working documents 
state), or is it the other way around (as the author believes it to be the 
case).

Food for the teleconf today.

Frank.
   ----

[1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2002Aug/0022.html

[2] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2002Aug/0023.html

Received on Thursday, 15 August 2002 07:58:43 UTC