- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:28:18 -0400
- To: Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl> Subject: Re: WOWG: agenda Aug 15 telecon Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:58:37 +0200 > > Further to my summary of the contributions to public comments list, > two new messages arrived today, both of which are also relevant to the > semantics discussion also on the agenda for today: > > Message [1] points out a bug in the DAML+OIL spec that we are about to be > bitten by as well if we don't take care. (Essentially the current DAML+OIL > spec of sameClassAs forces its arguments to be of type daml:Class, > even if without that statement they would only be of type rdfs:Class). My understanding is that this was a feature, not a bug. The use of sameClassAs in importing terms from RDF/RDFS is thus the bug. > Message [2] shows the confusion people have about the relation between RDF > and OWL: is every OWL document an RDFS document (as our working documents > state), or is it the other way around (as the author believes it to be the > case). Yes, this is a potential source of confusion. We will have to do extra work in this area. > Food for the teleconf today. > > Frank. > ---- > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2002Aug/0022.html > > [2] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2002Aug/0023.html peter
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2002 08:28:28 UTC