- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 21:30:00 +0200
- To: Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl, www-webont-wg@w3.org
He missed SWIL (Semantic Web Inference Language) ;-) Which logically would be paired with SWALLOW ;-) Cheers, Patrick > -----Original Message----- > From: ext Frank van Harmelen [mailto:Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl] > Sent: 22 November, 2001 23:05 > To: www-webont-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: What shall we call the web ontology language?? > > > Michael Sintek wrote: > > > SWOL -- Semantic Web Ontology Language > > Hans Akkermans (close colleague of Guus Schreiber and myself > here in Amsterdam), has done his homework. You can see the results at > > http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh/spool/names.html > > There are more names to choose from there then we will ever need. > > In response to this list, Shirley Tessler and Avron Barr have > suggested SOL (Standard Ontology Language), which is > currently also Hans' favourite. > > I would have proposed XOL (XML-based Ontology Language). This > would have had the advantage of dis-antagonising the > folk-who-claim-you-can-do-all-of-this-in-XML, but > unfortunately XOL is already in use for an XML based ontology > language. > > So, take your pick from http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh/spool/names.html > (and don't forget about SOL). > > Frank. > ---- > > PS: shall we discuss our logo next ? :-) >
Received on Friday, 23 November 2001 14:29:50 UTC