- From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:10:35 -0800
- To: <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
> 1) If this is an issue, it needs to be clarified in RFC2518 as > well. As far > as I can tell, there's currently no normative language how properties that > are present must be reported (just examples). > > 2) If we do this, we'll have to consider edge cases such as 207 :-) Since it's theoretically possible for clients to report 2xx values other than 200, it might be reasonable to add some language to 2518bis about the possibility. 207 doesn't seem like a real issue, since we're just talking about the value reported per property, inside the multistatus response. Again, I don't care too deeply about this -- having raised the issue, I'll defer to your editorial judgement on its resolution. - Jim
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 13:16:53 UTC