- From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:00:10 -0800
- To: "Babich, Alan" <ABabich@filenet.com>, "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
> That is not the same thing as saying that every repository would be > organized enough to provide a query schema. Providing QSD has to be > optional. Document management systems could easily provide access to the > data dictionary they already have. But other repositories, e.g., file > systems, might not have a centralized query schema. You're right, but it's a little worse than that. Systems where custom metadata could be anywhere (e.g. *any* dav system should support custom props) can't provide a complete query schema. However, QSD could become a *lot* more manageable with the simple feature of allowing the server to specify their behaviour as follows: "for any property not otherwise mentioned in the QS, searching follows these rules..." Then only the special cases (live properties which are known to be integers, for example) would have to be in the QSD. Lisa
Received on Friday, 25 January 2002 18:02:01 UTC