- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 12:01:44 +0100
- To: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>, <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
> From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 12:00 AM > To: Babich, Alan; 'Julian Reschke'; www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > Subject: RE: Call for Participation: new internet draft for WebDAV > SEARCH method > > > > > That is not the same thing as saying that every repository would be > > organized enough to provide a query schema. Providing QSD has to be > > optional. Document management systems could easily provide access to the > > data dictionary they already have. But other repositories, e.g., file > > systems, might not have a centralized query schema. > > You're right, but it's a little worse than that. Systems where custom > metadata could be anywhere (e.g. *any* dav system should support custom > props) can't provide a complete query schema. > > However, QSD could become a *lot* more manageable with the simple > feature of > allowing the server to specify their behaviour as follows: "for any > property not otherwise mentioned in the QS, searching follows these > rules..." > > Then only the special cases (live properties which are known to > be integers, > for example) would have to be in the QSD. See <http://www.greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-search-latest.htm l#rfc.section.5.20.2.1.1>
Received on Saturday, 26 January 2002 06:02:18 UTC