RE: CCXML: problem with IR 8_3_B/dialog.vxml [cc] - ISSUE-750

Chris,

We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to IR. The goal is to finalize the test-suite during the PR transition.
Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider it implicitly accepted.
If you need clarifications, please ask them very soon.

Paolo Baggia
Author of CCXML-IR Plan

ISSUE-750:

We accepted your request and the test will be fixed, then we will double check to avoid other occurrences.

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-voice-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-voice-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of RJ Auburn
Sent: giovedì 7 ottobre 2010 14.15
To: Chris Davis
Cc: www-voice; W3C Voice Browser Working Group
Subject: Re: CCXML: problem with IR 8_3_B/dialog.vxml [cc] - ISSUE-750

Chris:

Good catch - let me see if we can get that corrected quickly, it just managed to slip past us since I think a good number of us already support GSL in addition to the standard formats. I have this sucker tracked as ISSUE-750. 

	RJ

---
RJ Auburn
CTO, Voxeo Corporation
tel:+1-407-418-1800 
skype:zscgeek 



On Sep 29, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Chris Davis wrote:

> Hello www-voice,
> 
> Looking at the CCXML-IR test 8_3_B/dialog.vxml,
> that VXML document contains a non-standard speech grammar type (text/gsl).
> 
> On their website, even Voxeo recommends to not use it:
> http://docs.voxeo.com/voicexml/n2.0/frame.jsp?page=gslbasics.htm
> 
> I raise this issue because to pass the standards based CCML-IR for CCXML
> you need to support non-standard things for VXML.
> Does this make sense?
> 
> I'd recommend changing 8_3_B/dialog.vxml to remain standards based:
> --------------------
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
> <vxml version="2.0" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/vxml">
> <form id="Main">
>       <block>
>               <prompt timeout="200s">
>                       This is a dialog.
>       </prompt>
> 
>       </block>
> </form>
> </vxml>
> -------------
> 
> I regret not being able to raise this sooner, as my earlier IR report was completed
> using a simulator for the VXML dialog processor. Now my group has enough VXML
> completed to run in place of the simulator and this was discovered.
> 
> Regards,
> Chris
> 
> -- 
> Chris Davis
> Interact Incorporated R&D
> 512-502-9969x117
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 7 October 2010 15:18:10 UTC