- From: RJ Auburn <rj@voxeo.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 08:15:14 -0400
- To: Chris Davis <davisc@iivip.com>
- Cc: www-voice <www-voice@w3.org>, W3C Voice Browser Working Group <w3c-voice-wg@w3.org>
Chris: Good catch - let me see if we can get that corrected quickly, it just managed to slip past us since I think a good number of us already support GSL in addition to the standard formats. I have this sucker tracked as ISSUE-750. RJ --- RJ Auburn CTO, Voxeo Corporation tel:+1-407-418-1800 skype:zscgeek On Sep 29, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Chris Davis wrote: > Hello www-voice, > > Looking at the CCXML-IR test 8_3_B/dialog.vxml, > that VXML document contains a non-standard speech grammar type (text/gsl). > > On their website, even Voxeo recommends to not use it: > http://docs.voxeo.com/voicexml/n2.0/frame.jsp?page=gslbasics.htm > > I raise this issue because to pass the standards based CCML-IR for CCXML > you need to support non-standard things for VXML. > Does this make sense? > > I'd recommend changing 8_3_B/dialog.vxml to remain standards based: > -------------------- > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> > <vxml version="2.0" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/vxml"> > <form id="Main"> > <block> > <prompt timeout="200s"> > This is a dialog. > </prompt> > > </block> > </form> > </vxml> > ------------- > > I regret not being able to raise this sooner, as my earlier IR report was completed > using a simulator for the VXML dialog processor. Now my group has enough VXML > completed to run in place of the simulator and this was discovered. > > Regards, > Chris > > -- > Chris Davis > Interact Incorporated R&D > 512-502-9969x117 > > >
Received on Thursday, 7 October 2010 12:15:49 UTC