- From: RJ Auburn <rj@voxeo.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 09:06:22 -0400
- To: Petr Kuba <kuba@optimsys.cz>
- Cc: www-voice <www-voice@w3.org>, W3C Voice Browser Working Group <w3c-voice-wg@w3.org>
Petr: After reviewing this I actually think we would be best off by just deleting that sentence from the spec as all it's doing is redefining what should already exist via the simple fact we are using ECMAScript. Please let me know if this resolution is satisfactory. If we don't hear anything we will assume this is acceptable. Best regards, RJ --- RJ Auburn CTO, Voxeo Corporation tel:+1-407-418-1800 skype:zscgeek On Apr 25, 2010, at 5:52 PM, RJ Auburn wrote: > Petr: > > Thanks for submitting this issue. We are tracking this as ISSUE-681. We need to do a bit of research on this bit of the ecmascript spec but will be back to you shortly with a resolution. > > Thanks, > > RJ > > --- > RJ Auburn > CTO, Voxeo Corporation > tel:+1-407-418-1800 > > Come join us at our Voxeo Customer Summit, June 21st – June 23rd at the Hard Rock Hotel, register today for your All Access Pass: > http://www.voxeo.com/summits/customer > > > > On Apr 23, 2010, at 5:29 PM, Petr Kuba wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> We believe the definition of Class at the end of Section 3.4 Definitions is not correct: >> >> Reserved ECMAScript property 'prototype.constructor' MUST reference >> the class constructor object, so in the example above, >> 'MyConnection.prototype.constructor == Connection'. >> >> According to the ECMA Script specification, we believe the class constructor object should be referenced through 'constructor' instead of 'prototype.constructor': >> >> Reserved ECMAScript property 'constructor' MUST reference the class >> constructor object, so in the example above, >> 'MyConnection.constructor == Connection'. >> >> Thanks, >> Petr Kuba >> >> -- >> Petr Kuba, Project Manager >> OptimSys, s.r.o >> kuba@optimsys.cz >> Tel: +420 541 143 065 >> Fax: +420 541 143 066 >> http://www.optimsys.cz >> > >
Received on Thursday, 7 October 2010 13:07:02 UTC