Re: July CCXML Implementation Report: 10_5_7 and 10_5_8: invalid scripts with <join> - ISSUE-735

Petr,

We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to IR. The goal is to finalize the test-suite during the PR transition.
Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider it implicitly accepted.
If you need clarifications, please ask them very soon.

Paolo Baggia
Author of CCXML-IR Plan

ISSUE-735:

You are right, it will be fixed.

=================================
From: RJ Auburn <rj@voxeo.com> 
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:52:32 -0400
Cc: www-voice <www-voice@w3.org>, W3C Voice Browser Working Group <w3c-voice-wg@w3.org> 
Message-Id: <7F916889-0A2F-4768-8F0C-4B5D261B5A73@voxeo.com> 
To: Petr Kuba <kuba@optimsys.cz> 

Tracked as ISSUE-735

On Jul 26, 2010, at 6:21 AM, Petr Kuba wrote:

> Hello www-voice,
> 
> In 10_5_7, script 10_5_7_A_87.ccxml is used to test parameters of the <join> element:
> 
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <ccxml xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/09/ccxml" xmlns:conf="http://www.w3.org/2005/ccxml-conformance" version="1.0">
>    <var name="connid1" expr="application.connid"/>
>    <join id2="connid1"/>
> </ccxml>
> 
> The test assumes that the document loading fails because of the missing id1 parameter. However, the script contains so many errors (is invalid for so many reasons) that its loading can fail even if the <join> element parsing is not implemented correctly. For instance, in OptimTalk event error.createccxml contains the following reason: "tag <join> cannot be a child of tag <ccxml>".
> 
> Our recommendation is to use valid script with only one invalid <join> element.
> 
> The same problem appears in scripts 10_5_7_A_90.ccxml and 10_5_8_A_144.ccxml.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Petr
> 
> -- 
>  Petr Kuba, Project Manager
>  OptimSys, s.r.o
>  kuba@optimsys.cz
>  Tel: +420 541 143 065 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +420 541 143 065      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
>  Fax: +420 541 143 066
>  http://www.optimsys.cz

Received on Friday, 20 August 2010 13:10:59 UTC