Re: CCXML specification: Application variables - ISSUE-674

RJ,

we confirm that we accept the proposed resolution.

Thanks,
Petr


On 19.8.2010 15:08, RJ Auburn wrote:
> Petr
>
> We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to CCXML IR and specification.
>
> * We accepted your change and deleted the sentence.
>
> Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider it implicitly accepted.
>
> If you need clarifications, please feel free to let us know and we will do our best to resolve them.
>
> Best regards,
>
> 	RJ
> ---
> RJ Auburn
> CTO, Voxeo Corporation
> tel:+1-407-418-1800
> skype:zscgeek
>
>
>
> On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:54 PM, RJ Auburn wrote:
>
>> Petr:
>>
>> This is tracked as ISSUE-674. We will discuss this on the next CCXML working group meeting and let you know what we decide.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> 	RJ
>>
>> ---
>> RJ Auburn
>> CTO, Voxeo Corporation
>> tel:+1-407-418-1800
>>
>> On Apr 9, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Petr Kuba wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Last year we reported an error in the CCXML specification, Section 8.4. This was tracked as ISSUE-633.
>>>
>>> The original messages can be found here:
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2009OctDec/0022.html
>>>
>>> In the current Candidate Recommendation the example is already correct. However, the paragraph above the example still contains the following sentence:
>>>
>>> "Application variables that are not properties, e.g. objects, must be declared."
>>>
>>> We believe that this sentence is confusing and should be erased.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Petr Kuba
>>>
>>> --
>>>   Petr Kuba, Project Manager
>>>   OptimSys, s.r.o
>>>   kuba@optimsys.cz
>>>   Tel: +420 541 143 065
>>>   Fax: +420 541 143 066
>>>   http://www.optimsys.cz
>>>
>>

Received on Friday, 20 August 2010 08:14:36 UTC