Re: CCXML specification: Application variables - ISSUE-674

Petr

We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to CCXML IR and specification. 

* We accepted your change and deleted the sentence. 

Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider it implicitly accepted.

If you need clarifications, please feel free to let us know and we will do our best to resolve them.

Best regards,

	RJ
---
RJ Auburn
CTO, Voxeo Corporation
tel:+1-407-418-1800 
skype:zscgeek 



On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:54 PM, RJ Auburn wrote:

> Petr:
> 
> This is tracked as ISSUE-674. We will discuss this on the next CCXML working group meeting and let you know what we decide. 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 	RJ
> 
> ---
> RJ Auburn
> CTO, Voxeo Corporation
> tel:+1-407-418-1800
> 
> On Apr 9, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Petr Kuba wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Last year we reported an error in the CCXML specification, Section 8.4. This was tracked as ISSUE-633.
>> 
>> The original messages can be found here:
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2009OctDec/0022.html
>> 
>> In the current Candidate Recommendation the example is already correct. However, the paragraph above the example still contains the following sentence:
>> 
>> "Application variables that are not properties, e.g. objects, must be declared."
>> 
>> We believe that this sentence is confusing and should be erased.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Petr Kuba
>> 
>> -- 
>>  Petr Kuba, Project Manager
>>  OptimSys, s.r.o
>>  kuba@optimsys.cz
>>  Tel: +420 541 143 065
>>  Fax: +420 541 143 066
>>  http://www.optimsys.cz
>> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 19 August 2010 13:08:42 UTC