- From: RJ Auburn <rj@voxeo.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:57:03 -0400
- To: Petr Kuba <kuba@optimsys.cz>
- Cc: www-voice <www-voice@w3.org>, W3C Voice Browser Working Group <w3c-voice-wg@w3.org>
Tracked as ISSUE-739 On Jul 27, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Petr Kuba wrote: > Hello, > > this report deals with test 10_2_4, assertion 1286. > > Sorry for the confusion. > > Petr > > > On 26.7.2010 11:47, Petr Kuba wrote: >> Hello www-voice, >> >> In 10_2_3, assertion 1295 shows the following code: >> >> >> <transition event="user.START_ASSERTION_1286" state="ASSERTION_NMBR_1286"> >> <!-- >> 1286 >> 10.2.4 <assign> and <var> >> Execution of connection elements MUST NOT immediately change the state >> of any associated Connection Objects mscott@voicegenie.com Accepted >> --> >> <disconnect connectionid="ConnectionID"/> >> <if cond="session.connections[ConnectionID].state == Connection.CONNECTED"> >> <script>assertions[assert_index].P_F = s_PASS;</script> >> </if> >> <send targettype="'ccxml'" target="session.id" name="name_prepare_new"/> >> </transition> >> >> Unfortunately there is no <transition> for connection.disconnected. If >> this event is delivered before the event generated by <send> the >> following message is logged: >> >> 10_2_4 TA-1286: Comment: UNEXPECTED EVENT connection.disconnected IN >> STATE ASSERTION_NMBR_1286 >> >> We recommend to handle connection.disconnected correctly to keep the >> test clear. >> >> Thanks, >> Petr >> >
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2010 14:58:07 UTC