Re: July CCXML Implementation Report: 10_2_3: missing transition for connection.disconnected - should be 10_2_4

• From: Petr Kuba <kuba@optimsys.cz>
• Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:34:37 +0200
• To: www-voice <www-voice@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4C4F50ED.9060602@optimsys.cz>

Hello,

this report deals with test 10_2_4, assertion 1286.

Sorry for the confusion.

Petr


On 26.7.2010 11:47, Petr Kuba wrote:
> Hello www-voice,
>
> In 10_2_3, assertion 1295 shows the following code:
>
>
> <transition event="user.START_ASSERTION_1286" state="ASSERTION_NMBR_1286">
> <!--
> 1286
> 10.2.4 &lt;assign&gt; and &lt;var&gt;
> Execution of connection elements MUST NOT immediately change the state
> of any associated Connection Objects mscott@voicegenie.com Accepted
> -->
> <disconnect connectionid="ConnectionID"/>
> <if cond="session.connections[ConnectionID].state == Connection.CONNECTED">
> <script>assertions[assert_index].P_F = s_PASS;</script>
> </if>
> <send targettype="'ccxml'" target="session.id" name="name_prepare_new"/>
> </transition>
>
> Unfortunately there is no <transition> for connection.disconnected. If
> this event is delivered before the event generated by <send> the
> following message is logged:
>
> 10_2_4 TA-1286: Comment: UNEXPECTED EVENT connection.disconnected IN
> STATE ASSERTION_NMBR_1286
>
> We recommend to handle connection.disconnected correctly to keep the
> test clear.
>
> Thanks,
> Petr
>

Received on Tuesday, 27 July 2010 21:35:23 UTC