Re: [scxml] sixth WD of SCXML is published

Greg,

Here are responses to two more of your requests.  We will respond to the
rest as we review them.

 

2. Would it be possible for transition/@event to be of type NMTOKENS
instead of NMTOKEN?

>> We have accepted this request.  In the next public working draft, it
will be possible to specify multiple event names in transition/@event
(though we haven't decided exactly what type to use in the schema.)

 

What happens if a <history> with no default transition is the target 

of a transition?

>>  This cannot happen because the transition is mandatory.  Section
3.11.2 says that the transition child "Occurs once."  However, the
schema  needs to be fixed since it makes the transition child optional.
This will be fixed in the next draft.  

 

-          Jim 

 


					
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files attached may contain confidential and proprietary information of Alcatel-Lucent and/or its affiliated entities. Access by the intended recipient only is authorized. Any liability arising from any party acting, or refraining from acting, on any information contained in this e-mail is hereby excluded. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, destroy the original transmission and its attachments and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Copyright in this e-mail and any attachments belongs to Alcatel-Lucent and/or its affiliated entities.