- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:05:31 +0100
- To: "Baggia Paolo" <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>
- Cc: www-voice@w3.org, "Janina Sajka" <janina@rednote.net>
On 27/07/06, Baggia Paolo <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com> wrote: > > Dear Janina, > > Thanks for your interesting comment. > > A possible resolution would be to add a paragraph into Section 1 [1] > that describes the scenario you mentioned. > > We think the best would be if you can propose a paragraph and we will > review it. Why? Isn't the WG capable of generating text based on user input? I notice the new requirements totally ignore the comments previously submitted and deferred on the grounds that 'they will be included in the next round'. Why not admit this is an implementors WG and have done with it? -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Thursday, 27 July 2006 17:05:39 UTC