- From: Moshe Yudkowsky <speech@pobox.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:29:03 -0500
- To: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Cc: www-voice@w3.org
Al, >Some previous discussion related to this idea has revolved around > >.. better identification for events (not blocking any states from seeing them) >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006JanMar/thread.html#msg98 >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006AprJun/thread.html#msg2 > >.. spawning states that are waiting for a callback from an asynchronous >external service >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006AprJun/thread.html#msg4 Thank you for briging these to my attention. >At least in the desktop world, we have situations where Assistive >Technologies post listeners for events that the author didn't >anticipate. So I would think twice about saying that certain events >are _only_ seen by states known to the event. That's absolutely a danger, but it'd be very convinient to be able to ignore events that you know are meaningless outside a particular state. -- Moshe Yudkowsky Disaggregate 2952 W Fargo Chicago, IL 60645 USA Work: www.Disaggregate.com Book: www.PebbleAndAvalanche.com speech@pobox.com +1 773 764 8727
Received on Friday, 23 June 2006 20:29:06 UTC