The W3C working group responsible for that document removed that advice in the recommendation when it was published. That DTD is not supported, and as far as I know is not up to date. Sorry. On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Philip Taylor <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk> wrote: > > > Shane McCarron wrote: > > > As far as I know there is no official HTML 4.01+RDFa 1.1 DTD. So > > you should not be using that to validate. If you want to use HTML4 > > constructs and RDFa 1.1, you might just use the HTML5 document type. > > You can see the latest RDFa recommendation related to this topic at > > http://www.w3.org/TR/html-rdfa/ > > Alternatively you can follow the advice given by the W3C at : > > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/#validation > > which reads : > > > Documents written using the markup language defined in this > > specification may be validated using the DTD defined in this section. > > If a document author wants to facilitate such validation, they may > > include the following declaration at the top of their document: > > > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML+RDFa 1.1//EN" > > "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/html401-rdfa11-1.dtd"> > > > Philip Taylor > -- Shane P. McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2013 17:02:20 UTC