- From: Philip Taylor <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 17:52:59 +0100
- To: shane@aptest.com, Andrea Urbini <andrea.urbini@unifi.it>
- CC: www-validator@w3.org, urbini@unifi.it
Shane McCarron wrote: > As far as I know there is no official HTML 4.01+RDFa 1.1 DTD. So > you should not be using that to validate. If you want to use HTML4 > constructs and RDFa 1.1, you might just use the HTML5 document type. > You can see the latest RDFa recommendation related to this topic at > http://www.w3.org/TR/html-rdfa/ Alternatively you can follow the advice given by the W3C at : http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/#validation which reads : > Documents written using the markup language defined in this > specification may be validated using the DTD defined in this section. > If a document author wants to facilitate such validation, they may > include the following declaration at the top of their document: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML+RDFa 1.1//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/html401-rdfa11-1.dtd"> Philip Taylor
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2013 16:53:29 UTC