- From: Michael Adams <linux_mike@paradise.net.nz>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:15:33 +1300
- To: www-validator@w3.org
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:30:34 +0100 Frank Ellermann wrote: > > olivier Thereaux wrote: > > > it is a venture into the realm of nonstandard, nevertheless. > > It's also a way to get rid of errors and warnings you're determined > to ignore. The X in XHTML is supposed to mean eXtensible. > > > Custom DTDs are fun and fine if used by people who know what > > they're doing > > That's true for any DTD. I disagree here, big difference between trying to conform to an existing DTD (then validating using it) - and writing your own DTD then ensuring your code is valid. It is a different order of magnitude. [snip] -- Michael All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well - Julian of Norwich 1342 - 1416
Received on Saturday, 19 January 2008 19:15:13 UTC