W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-validator@w3.org > August 2008

Re: [ANN] markup validator 0.8.3 released

From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 01:22:26 +0200
To: www-validator@w3.org
Message-ID: <g7ikdl$gls$1@ger.gmane.org>

olivier Thereaux wrote:
> We released today a new version of the Markup Validator

Great, thanks.
> For more info on the change, see the new page:
> http://validator.w3.org/whatsnew.html#t2008-08-08

Something with the added "historical HTML i18n" isn't as

| the Document Type (-//IETF//DTD HTML i18n//EN) is not in the
| validator's catalog

Did you use another public identifier ?

The "whatsnew" file says:

| Conformance: The validator now warns about incorrect
| public/system identifiers combinations

They are not really "incorrect", or are they ?  The
warning uses the adjective "inconsistent".  I still
wonder how that's supposed to work:

The validator knows some public identifiers (but not
all).  Where that is not the case the validator uses
the system identifier to find the DTD.

Users are in the same position wrt to their own local
tools, and their set of "known" public identifiers is
different from what the validator knows.

Shouldn't they be able to use system identifiers that
make sense from their local POV ?  I vaguely recall 
that some system identifiers for W3C DTDs used to be
relative URLs.  IIRC that was the reason why I used
absolute URLs making sense from my POV, URL's in the
validator's catalog...  Which are not the "official"
system identifiers.


> Many thanks to those who have helped with this release, by reporting
> bugs, suggesting fixes or documentation tweaks, or provided patches.
> ** Send Feedback - Get Involved **
> The markup Validator is one of the many open source software projects
> created and maintained at W3C: your participation in sending feedback
> and ideas, patches and bug reports helps build better tools.
> The mailing-list www-validator is the primary discussion channel for
> users and contributors of the Markup Validator (and Link Checker).
> Please make sure to search the archives before sending in a new idea
> or request, as a courtesy to the many readers of the list.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/
> Bug reports and patches can be sent to the public W3C Bugzilla
> database. Usual bug reporting guidelines apply - make sure your bug
> is a bug, make sure it is not yet known, and give precise and
> complete information to reproduce.
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/
> For an overview of feedback mechanisms for the validator, see:
> http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html
> Thank you,
> olivier.
> -- 
> olivier Thereaux - W3C - http://www.w3.org/People/olivier/
> W3C Open Source Software: http://www.w3.org/Status
Received on Friday, 8 August 2008 23:22:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:59:09 UTC