- From: H. Hahn <h.hahn@hahn-informatica.nl>
- Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:07:55 +0200
- To: www-validator@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4895C9CB.2020002@hahn-informatica.nl>
L.S., While developing a website, I wanted to validate a certain page that is password-protected. As I was logged in at a sufficiently high level, having access to all pages, I tacitly expected the validator to have the same rights as its invoker (i.e., me) had. First of all, I noticed that the validator completed the validation much quicker than I was used to. Also, and error and a warning were reported that in no way could apply to the page I tried to validate. Only after I re-validated with displaying the complete source code, I found that it had not validated the requested page, but the "Page not found" page. Basically, this was correct, as the validator apparently was refused access to the page. However, both the validator's address field and the validation result text mentioned the correct URL of the original page, without any mention of the "Page not found" page. As I see it, it would be better -- and more correct as well -- when in such a case the validator would report something like: /"You requested validation of page 'www.domain.com?id=pagetwentyfive&blahblabla'. However, the validator found itself redirected to page 'www.domain.com/pagenotfound.php'. For the latter page, the validation results were:..."/ Would it perhaps be a good suggestion if you change this? After all, when a browser is redirected this way, its address field does show the URL of the page actually shown. So this information is available at the moment the report is being compiled and the two URLs can simply be compared. Thank you very much in advance. Sincerely, Hahn Informatica Ir. H. Hahn Braak 48 NL-5501DK Veldhoven Nederland / Niederlande / Netherlands Tel. +31 40 2300161 Fax +31 40 2300163 E-mail: h.hahn@hahn-informatica.nl Website: www.hahn-informatica.nl BTW/MWSt/VAT: NL 092 081 046 B01 KvK/IHK/RC: NL 170 62224
Received on Sunday, 3 August 2008 15:08:32 UTC