- From: Karim A. <directeur@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:34:40 +0100
- To: "olivier Thereaux" <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: "Chris Parrish" <chris.forummail@swankinnovations.com>, www-validator@w3.org
Bonjour Olivier, Chris, everyone! On 10/15/07, olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> wrote: > Yes, they are, the helpwanted could indeed be removed altogether from > soap output. I don't actually agree with this Olivier, this link has its purpose and meaning after all. If we remove it, we lose the chance to have more -maybe constructive- feedback from users outside the W3C validator. In fact, apps may offer the possibility to help back the W3C. But IMHO the soap api should offer more flexibility to the app developer in order to be able to represent, formulate and design his feedback links ans sub-systems the way he want it, without any formal or style impeachments > Regarding your suggestions for the output, things like: > > <m:explanationparagraphtext> > ... sound a bit overkill. What's the gain between this and a <p>? Again, I strongly believe that an HTML content isn't just text wrapped with tags, and the html explanation the way it is given now has two sides: the content and its inner semantics. So, I agree, HTML explanation is richer hence better than flat text. Karim -- http://akoncept.com Innovate Humanum Est
Received on Monday, 15 October 2007 23:34:50 UTC