- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:47:17 +0900
- To: Chris Parrish <chris.forummail@swankinnovations.com>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
Hi Chris, all. On Oct 11, 2007, at 09:00 , Chris Parrish wrote: > Bummer. Well, as a compromise, are the explanation messages (in HTML) > separate from the helpwanted links? Yes, they are, the helpwanted could indeed be removed altogether from soap output. Regarding your suggestions for the output, things like: > <m:explanationparagraphtext> ... sound a bit overkill. What's the gain between this and a <p>? As you write elsewhere: > Yes, it is repetitive, and in many cases (including mine) one could > use the > html version just fine. ... > what if they change the messages and their markup? If your app > was critical enough, you'd have a problem and maybe not even know it. If the soap markup is generated from the message, and the messages change, the soap output would change, too. -- olivier
Received on Monday, 15 October 2007 00:47:31 UTC