- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 15:37:11 +0300
- To: Sierk Bornemann <sierkb@gmx.de>
- Cc: "www-validator@w3.org Community" <www-validator@w3.org>
On Apr 25, 2007, at 13:10, Sierk Bornemann wrote: > I *want* to use XHTML, lastly to promote it. I intentionally *want* > to use XHTML 1.1 Why? > Browsers like the Internet Explorer, who don't work correctly, have > got a bad standing (espacially in my eyes), and I am *not* willing > to provide (or going further: foster) this bad standing any longer. Does this mean you are going to serve application/xhtml+xml exclusively without any text/html concession to IE? http://www.kafsemo.org/2007/02/26.html > The browser vendor, especially Microsoft, *has to do* his homework > in delivering a good and reliable piece of software. If he doesn't, > it is his own fault, and the user should know, that there does > exist competition out there, which is far better to switch to. How does the user know if you specifically expend effort to hide the IE issue from your readers? > My solution in rewriting the MIME type by the webserver, if it > makes sense, is a compromise to not let the Internet Explorer out > of the playground. How does that relate to "I am *not* willing to provide (or going further: foster) this bad standing any longer"? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Sunday, 29 April 2007 12:37:14 UTC