- From: Jaffe <jaffer@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:42:25 -0500
- To: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
- Message-Id: <2e682c4bc4e68c562e3c2f7d15115ee6@earthlink.net>
As a .edu site, would that have been created using any Federal
> funding? If so, I suspect it will be in violation of Section 508.
I read this Section 508 piece. Could you be more clear about how this
might be a violation. You see DELL has won a huge bid to control NYC
School purchasing, inventory and sales
http://www.managedservices.nycenet.edu/ I have grave concerns that
they are not being fair to other vendors by forcing someone like me to
use a browser that is only supported on a platform that they sell.
You get my point?
On Jan 28, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
> Hmmm, just a few fragments from the code of the page
> cited should provide an indication of the source of
> the problems ...
>
> try {
> var doc = this._createdoc("2.5", "Microsoft.XMLDOM");
> var doc26 = this._createdoc("2.6",
> "MSXML2.DOMDocument.2.6");
> var doc30 = this._createdoc("3.0",
> "MSXML2.DOMDocument.3.0");
>
> // Check to see if 3.0 sp1 is installed
> this._checkfor30sp1(doc30);
>
> var doc40 = this._createdoc("4.0",
> "MSXML2.DOMDocument.4.0");
> }
> catch (e) {
> this._log("Error: " + e.description);
> }
>
> ...
>
> var doc = new ActiveXObject(progId);
>
> ...
>
> // There were a lot of bug fixes in version 3.0 sp1
> // so we want to see if that has been installed.
> // Check the KB article Q290988 which describes this
> // test.
>
> ...
>
> // At this point, we know the version, but we need to find out
> // if we are in replace mode. That is, see if the old ProgID
> // Microsoft.XMLDOM is really one of the newer MSXML2+
> references.
> // Version 2.6+ introduced a new property called .namespaces, so
> // check to see if it exists in old doc. Since xmlinst did not
> // exist until version 3, we can safely assume that if this test
> // passes, then the user has version 3 in replace mode.
>
> ....
>
> <td>MATERIALS FOR GOVERNMENTAL DELIBERATIVE AND EXECUTIVE
> DECISION-MAKING PROCESS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL</td>
>
> But only for Govermental servants willing to toe the (MS) party line !
>
Attachments
- text/enriched attachment: stored
Received on Friday, 28 January 2005 16:42:37 UTC