- From: Jaffe <jaffer@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:42:25 -0500
- To: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: www-validator@w3.org
- Message-Id: <2e682c4bc4e68c562e3c2f7d15115ee6@earthlink.net>
As a .edu site, would that have been created using any Federal > funding? If so, I suspect it will be in violation of Section 508. I read this Section 508 piece. Could you be more clear about how this might be a violation. You see DELL has won a huge bid to control NYC School purchasing, inventory and sales http://www.managedservices.nycenet.edu/ I have grave concerns that they are not being fair to other vendors by forcing someone like me to use a browser that is only supported on a platform that they sell. You get my point? On Jan 28, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > Hmmm, just a few fragments from the code of the page > cited should provide an indication of the source of > the problems ... > > try { > var doc = this._createdoc("2.5", "Microsoft.XMLDOM"); > var doc26 = this._createdoc("2.6", > "MSXML2.DOMDocument.2.6"); > var doc30 = this._createdoc("3.0", > "MSXML2.DOMDocument.3.0"); > > // Check to see if 3.0 sp1 is installed > this._checkfor30sp1(doc30); > > var doc40 = this._createdoc("4.0", > "MSXML2.DOMDocument.4.0"); > } > catch (e) { > this._log("Error: " + e.description); > } > > ... > > var doc = new ActiveXObject(progId); > > ... > > // There were a lot of bug fixes in version 3.0 sp1 > // so we want to see if that has been installed. > // Check the KB article Q290988 which describes this > // test. > > ... > > // At this point, we know the version, but we need to find out > // if we are in replace mode. That is, see if the old ProgID > // Microsoft.XMLDOM is really one of the newer MSXML2+ > references. > // Version 2.6+ introduced a new property called .namespaces, so > // check to see if it exists in old doc. Since xmlinst did not > // exist until version 3, we can safely assume that if this test > // passes, then the user has version 3 in replace mode. > > .... > > <td>MATERIALS FOR GOVERNMENTAL DELIBERATIVE AND EXECUTIVE > DECISION-MAKING PROCESS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL</td> > > But only for Govermental servants willing to toe the (MS) party line ! >
Attachments
- text/enriched attachment: stored
Received on Friday, 28 January 2005 16:42:37 UTC