- From: Jaffe <jaffer@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:37:18 -0500
- To: www-validator@w3.org
I want to thank you for your very clear response. Basically the reason I wrote this is because in NYC we work in a dual platform environment. The Board of Ed constantly created programs that we are expected to use but writes them for one browser. In my case as a Mac user (not a crazy mac fanatic) I am then forced to use a wintel machine. Some answers I get are "that other browsers are not as secure" or it is "too expensive to change the code once it is built" I find it hard to believe that my bank (which accepts multiple browsers and platforms) is not secure since they work. Once again thank you, I will use your info for a future meeting with the "Powers that be" Steven Jaffe On Jan 28, 2005, at 11:20 AM, David Dorward wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 10:21:31AM -0500, Jaffe wrote: > >> I am a trying to find out how you can find if a web page is supported >> by more than one browser? Is there a universal code that all browsers >> accept. > > In theory all browsers should be able to handle HTML to a level > represented by the standards published before the release of the > software (given some time to implement that standard). HTML 4.x is > about a decade old now, so all current browsers should be able to cope > with it. > > In practise, however, browsers tend to fail to implement the complete > spec, and/or have errors in their implementations. Internet Explorer > is typically the worst offender in todays crop of graphical browsers. > > This doesn't mean that standards should be ignored, they are still a > lot better then the chaos of vendor specific extensions. > >> The reason I am asking is I am a teacher in a school that uses >> firefox to access certain Board of Ed sites. I am denied access to >> certain places because the site says must have IE > > Some websites make use of heafty JavaScript routines which only work > on specific browsers, however there is rarely a good reason to do this > - especially for Internet (as opposed to Intranet) websites. > > Other site authors, it seems, just can't be bothered to write cross > platform code. Scottish Power, for example, used to (they seem to have > fixed this now) block non-IE browsers to their entire site. If you > spoofed your User-Agent string so your browser pretended to be IE you > could still get in ... to read the "What to do in the event of a gas > leak" information which (according to SP) wouldn't work except in IE. > >> and it just says >> initializing http://www.managedservices.nycenet.edu/default.asp. > > As a .edu site, would that have been created using any Federal > funding? If so, I suspect it will be in violation of Section 508. > > <http://www.section508.gov/> > >> I am on a Mac and IE is not supported anymore. Can you give me any >> further info on how I can bring this to their attention so the code >> is improved. > > <http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/> and > <http://webstandards.org/learn/faq/> might be of some use. > > > -- > David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk >
Received on Friday, 28 January 2005 16:37:48 UTC