Re: Checker isn't valid HTML

On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 19:34, Glen Starrett wrote:
> Try checking the output from http://validator.w3.org/check with
> itself... even the "error, no parameters" page will produce HTML
> without character encoding, and won't pass itself.  Seems a bit ironic
> that even the standards website doesn't meet the standards...
>  
> Thought you should know (and could use a laugh).

We did and fixed it some time ago, the current beta release doesn't have
this problem:
<http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fvalidator.w3.org%3A8001%2Fcheck>

-- 
\/ille Skyttä
ville.skytta at iki.fi

Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2003 13:32:42 UTC