- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 05:22:10 +0200
- To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
- cc: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> wrote: >One thing, however, that is still vague, is the "claim" issue. The >trademark policy has something about claims, but it doesn't really cover >conformance claims, which the "valid foo" icons basically are. >Conformance claims for documents are even more complicated than for e.g >software implementations, as the claim may be valid when made, and "slip >out" when the document changes. > >There may be technical solutions (like serving different icons depending >on actual validity), but the social (legal?) questions remain. We >(validator) could try and imitate what WAI has done at: >http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG1-Conformance Well, if it becomes an issue we can always generate a cryptographical checksum (a SHA-1 hash ought to do) of the page we validated and include that as part of the result. Dunno that I'd bother though... :-) -- Now Playing "Work Song" by "Nina Simone"", from the album "Feeling Good - The Very Best Of".
Received on Friday, 18 April 2003 23:22:14 UTC