- From: David Thielen <dave@windward.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 07:52:26 -0600
- To: "Olivier Thereaux" <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: "Liam Quinn" <liam@htmlhelp.com>, <www-validator@w3.org>
But in the file I sent it's not that. It's <p><p><p>.....</p></p></p> - dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Olivier Thereaux" <ot@w3.org> To: "David Thielen" <dave@windward.net> Cc: "Liam Quinn" <liam@htmlhelp.com>; <www-validator@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 8:35 PM Subject: Re: I think I've found a file that fails & shouldn't > > On Friday, Apr 18, 2003, at 11:27 Asia/Tokyo, David Thielen wrote: > > > > > Ok, but again, then why does it fail it in the validator? I agree with > > everything you have said but I don't understand why the validator > > fails it > > in this case. > > Take Liam's example: > > <p></p><p>foo</p></p> > > Parse it... > > <p></p> > => OK, paragraph opened and closed, we're done with that one > <p>foo</p> > => OK, paragraph opened and closed, we're done with that one > </p> > => uh? what's that, closing a paragraph that doesn't exist? > > So eventhough you think the <p> and </p> are balanced, if you add the > implied closing tags, they're not. > > -- > Olivier > >
Received on Friday, 18 April 2003 09:52:45 UTC