- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:29:38 -0400
- To: "Clark Alexander" <clark@clarkandlucina.com>, "'Bjoern Hoehrmann'" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
At 22:15 -0400 2003-04-14, Clark Alexander wrote: >Not that I know what #PCDATA children are, but thanks. What's the >reference for that? However, wouldn't that not conflict with the goals >of xhtml? That is to reformulate html so that it is consistent with >well-formed xml? That doesn't appear to be well formed. While I >understand that xhtml transitional was pretty tolerant, I was under the >impression that was fairly limited to merely allowing deprecated >elements and attributes. It's well formed. :) It's not semantically necessary correct, but HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0 doesn't make any conformant requirements on the semantics... so :/ -- Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager http://www.w3.org/QA/ --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Monday, 14 April 2003 22:50:12 UTC