- From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:05:43 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Simon Hill <red_one@othersdietrying.com>
- cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-validator <www-validator@w3.org>
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Lloyd Wood wrote: > On 14 Jan 2002, Simon Hill wrote: > > > On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 04:03, Lloyd Wood wrote: > > > > > > Individual draft. If it was adopted by an IETF WG it might be more > > > convincing as something to start work towards... > > > > > > But really, RFC3023 already puts the +xml suffix convention on the > > > standards track; that is more than enough to go on, given that > > > application/xhtml is already supported. > > > > so as far as the IETF is concerned, what's the mime type for XHTML? > > I'd guess application/html, based on RFC 2584. gah! text/html... sorry, L. <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>
Received on Monday, 14 January 2002 06:40:07 UTC