Re: validator not doing application/xhtml+xml

On 14 Jan 2002, Simon Hill wrote:

> On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 04:03, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> >
> > Individual draft. If it was adopted by an IETF WG it might be more
> > convincing as something to start work towards...
> >
> > But really, RFC3023 already puts the +xml suffix convention on the
> > standards track; that is more than enough to go on, given that
> > application/xhtml is already supported.
>
> so as far as the IETF is concerned, what's the mime type for XHTML?

I'd guess application/html, based on RFC 2584.

L.

<L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>

Received on Monday, 14 January 2002 06:00:42 UTC