Re: validator not doing application/xhtml+xml from Simon Hill on 2002-01-14 (www-validator@w3.org from January 2002)

From: Simon Hill <red_one@othersdietrying.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2002 21:53:34 +1100
To: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, www-validator@w3.org
Message-Id: <1011005616.2246.2.camel@whistler>

On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 04:03, Lloyd Wood wrote:
> 
> Individual draft. If it was adopted by an IETF WG it might be more
> convincing as something to start work towards...
> 
> But really, RFC3023 already puts the +xml suffix convention on the
> standards track; that is more than enough to go on, given that
> application/xhtml is already supported.
> 
> L.

so as far as the IETF is concerned, what's the mime type for XHTML?

Received on Monday, 14 January 2002 05:53:41 UTC