- From: Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:03:09 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Simon Hill <red_one@othersdietrying.com>
- cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, <www-validator@w3.org>
On 12 Jan 2002, Simon Hill wrote: > On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 11:40, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > * Simon Hill wrote: > > >the validator refuses to attempt XHTML when given the > > >application/xhtml+xml mime type... > > >can we please have this fixed? > > > > Sure, as soon as the application/xhtml+xml registration > > becomes an RFC and IANA registers that type. > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-baker-xhtml-media-reg-02.txt > isn't good enough? Individual draft. If it was adopted by an IETF WG it might be more convincing as something to start work towards... But really, RFC3023 already puts the +xml suffix convention on the standards track; that is more than enough to go on, given that application/xhtml is already supported. L. <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>
Received on Monday, 14 January 2002 05:30:48 UTC