- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 15:21:56 +0900
- To: Stephane Gourichon <Stephane.Gourichon@lip6.fr>, Bob Rosenberg <webmaster@rockmug.org>
- Cc: <www-validator@w3.org>
At 10:41 02/01/05 +0100, Stephane Gourichon wrote: >What I mean: of course, "Document type" and "Character encoding" in the >validator form are "override" features, but if they are offered for the >web, they should both be offered also for file upload. > >Why is "Document type" offered when one chooses the file upload feature, >and not "Document encoding" ? Both of the informations can be present in >the html source. > >If one of them could be removed from the form, it would be the "Document >type", not the "Character encoding". Because the web server may tell (in >the http header) the character encoding, it is ok if it is not in the >file. > >The right thing, im my humble opinion, is to offer both of them in the >"file upload" form. Yes. They are already available in the internal version. Please try them out at http://validator.w3.org:8188/file-upload.html and tell us whether it works. Regards, Martin.
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:55:38 UTC