- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 17:21:00 +0200
- To: W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
- cc: Jay Knight <jhknight@olemiss.edu>
Jay Knight <jhknight@olemiss.edu> wrote: >The validator just told me that it couldn't validate my page, because >the content-type was application/xhtml+xml. This is what it should be >according to >http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/xhtml-media-types.xhtml. > >What am I missing? About one update of the public Validator I'd say. :-) application/xhtml+xml is supported in the current development version, but hasn't made it into the current public version yet. Expect this to appear in the next update. -- Editor's note: in the last update, we noted that Larry Wall would "vomment" on existing RFCs. Some took that to be a cross between "vomit" and "comment." We are unsure of whether it was a subconscious slip or a typographical error. We are also unsure of whether or not to regret the error. -- use.perl.org
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2002 11:36:19 UTC