- From: Carole Anne Gay <carole@designs.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:21:05 -0700
- To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>, W3C Validator <www-validator@w3.org>
Thanks, Terje for providing the png :) I think it's a winner, too! And thanks Bjoern, for creating it! 7/27/01 1:04:14 AM, Terje Bless <link@pobox.com> wrote: >On 27.07.01 at 05:05, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > >> Quite a while ago I asked for somebody making SVG versions of the >>Validator Icons. No one did. I did! :-) At least it is a first try. >>Actually it's my first SVG image ever ;-) You may have a look at it at >> >> http://www.websitedev.de/svg/vxhtml11.svg >> http://www.websitedev.de/svg/vxhtml11.svgz > >Woah! Tres Cool! Collect _major_ Cool Points from Fonzie. :-) > >Here's what it looks like on my box ><URL:http://newsreaders.com/~link/bjorn.png>. It's using the Adobe SVG >plugin in Internet Explorer Mac (and display depth is just 8bit; so don't >worry if the colors look funny). > > >>changing this to whatever you want instead is as easy as replacing the >>strings "XHTML" and "1.1" with whatever you want. > >Cool! Hmm, I wonder if we could get W3C Comms to put their stamp of >approval on an SVG version and then use some tool to autogenerate the GIF >and PNG versions from that? That would save us a lot of trouble whenever a >new Rec. comes out. > > >>Did Polly say he wants a really big cracker for this? ;-) > >How big a cracker do you want? :-) > >Beers (or beverage of your choice) are on me if we ever cross paths IRL! > > >>PS: I suggest to add support for image/svg+xml; it's rather annoying to >> use the file upload feature to circumvent the MIME type checks... >> No, it's currently not registered at IANA, nor is there some >> internet draft for this approach, unfortunaly... > >Is there a W3C Rec. that sez to use image/svg+xml for this? > >The problem with text/xhtml+xml (and text/xml and application/xml) is that >the W3C hasn't decided what it wants those to mean yet. Adding them to the >Validator will make people try to return what the Validator will accept and >if the W3C then later changes it's mind, and redefines the meaning of those >content types, we'll have confused people to no good end. > >If that isn't a problem with image/svg+xml I'd be happy to add it. > > Carole Gay HTML Writers Guild Online Education Instructor, HTML and Design Concepts http://hwg.org/ Director, HTML Writers Guild Gutenberg Project http://gutenberg.hwg.org/
Received on Friday, 27 July 2001 15:21:39 UTC