- From: Peter K. Sheerin <pete@petesguide.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 07:31:32 -0700
- To: "Terje Bless" <link@tss.no>, "Thanasis Kinias" <tkinias@optimalco.com>
- Cc: "W3C Validator" <www-validator@w3.org>
> BTW, I seem to recall that the conclusion to that thread was that these
> characters are actually invalid in HTML 4, but _valid_ in XHTML (since XML
> 1.0 SE removed the word "graphic" from "any valid graphic character"). Did
> I read that wrong or are we actually failing in _both_ HTML and XHTML?
I don't think they're valid in XHTML either, even if they are in XML: This
is from xhtml1.dcl:
<!SGML -- SGML Declaration for valid XML documents --
"ISO 8879:1986 (WWW)"
CHARSET
BASESET
"ISO Registration Number 176//CHARSET
ISO/IEC 10646-1:1993 UCS-4 with implementation
level 3//ESC 2/5 2/15 4/6"
DESCSET
0 9 UNUSED
9 2 9
11 2 UNUSED
13 1 13
14 18 UNUSED
32 95 32
127 1 UNUSED
128 32 UNUSED
Received on Thursday, 19 July 2001 11:50:26 UTC