- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 13:16:18 +0900
- To: "Diman Grozny" <evil1@hotbox.ru>, <www-validator@w3.org>
At 14:23 01/07/18 -0400, Diman Grozny wrote: > > Well, It's a bad host name, see RFC 1034, RFC 1123 and RFC 2396, they > > must not start or end with a dash. > >Thank you, everyone, for clarifying that. That's our fault! >Now, I guess I'll have to copy the site to somewhere else to have its >contents validated. >-------------- >Just a thought: It seems that a site with a "bad hostname" has no chance of >getting validated, and that seems a bit unfair.. the guy who created the >site would really prefer to stick with the "bad" hostname. Hello Diman, If it's a problem of money, then I think the site creator should get a new domain name for free, including all the redirects. The problem is clearly a severe mistake with whoever runs hotbot.ru and accepted the clan-xz- registration. Please don't let such a mistake go by without reacting. If you do, we'll get domain names like a+b?c$d or so, really, really bad. Regards, Martin. >Wouldn't it be >nice to somehow avoid checking the very URL being validated, or get a >warning instead of getting rejected altogether? I think every site should >"have a right" to be validated, even the ones with a bad URL.. Well, if >that's not worth it, that's fine with me.. >-------------- >Again, thanks for clarifying the problem!
Received on Thursday, 19 July 2001 00:26:37 UTC